Emergency Notice | Although we are in the midst of a global epidemic, we want to assure our current and inquiring clients that we are working diligently while taking all necessary and precautionary steps to ensure the safety and health of our WKW staff. ***Please note that we offer virtual meetings.***
Injury Attorneys | Restoring LivesTM
The Indiana Supreme Court has given the state a new approach for determining liability in sports injury cases. Whereas liability in such cases had previously focused on the conduct of the plaintiffs, in Pfenning v. Lineman the court ruled that it is the actions of the defendant that are paramount.
More specifically, the Court stated: “We hold that, in negligence claims against a participant in a sports activity, if the conduct of such participant is within the range of ordinary behavior of participants in the sport, the conduct is reasonable as a matter of law and does not constitute a breach of duty.”
The ramifications are significant. First, the ruling has removed “primary assumption of risk” from the equation, shifting the focus from the risks assumed by the injured plaintiff to the reasonableness of the defendant’s conduct. This change eliminates all discussion concerning legal duty and puts the focus on whether the defendant committed any acts of negligence through their participation in the sporting activity.
Changing the analysis from a duty question to a negligence question may also open the door for claims against sporting facilities or equipment manufactures that previously were protected from claims by the primary assumption of risk doctrine. It will take time to sort out how much change the ruling actually brings to this area of law.
In sum, Pfenning v. Lineman does serve to clear up a confusing and increasingly untenable series of cases governing sports injury cases. Shifting the focus to the defendant to determine if the conduct falls within the range of ordinary behavior of participants in the sport makes the legal analysis much cleaner. It also opens up the ability to argue the circumstances surrounding the injury and the conduct of the defendant.
Additionally, it prevents property owners and equipment manufacturers from latching on to arguments in which they claim no duty or responsibility, thus shielding them from liability. It will be interesting to see how this ruling applies to future cases.
If you or a loved one have been injured as a result of someone else’s negligence while participating in a sport, you are urged to contact the Indianapolis Personal Injury Attorneys of Wilson Kehoe Winingham. The lawyers at WKW can help you get the compensation you deserve. Call 317.920.6400 or fill out an online contact form for a free, no-obligation case evaluation.
It's so overwhelming when you walk into. One night you're going to bed and everything's fine and the next minute your son's fighting for his…
An experienced personal injury attorney won't just settle for reimbursement of medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. They will also go after all…
Damages refers to financial compensation awarded after a lawsuit. For personal injury claims in Indiana, a successful plaintiff is entitled to damages in a sum…