Injury Attorneys | Restoring LivesTM
In October 2014, a jury found Trinity Industries guilty of fraud for selling a new guardrail design as government-approved when it was not. On June 9, 2015, a Texas federal judge ordered the world’s largest guardrail manufacturer to pay $663 million plus attorney fees.
Trinity’s ET-plus guardrails are meant to fold-up accordion-style upon impact, thus reducing damage to vehicles and death or injury to occupants. A number of years ago, Trinity changed the guardrail’s design without notifying the federal government. It then marketed its product as government-approved when it was not.
The design change saved Trinity about $2.00 per piece.
When Joshua Harman, a competitor, became aware of the fact that Trinity was marketing the guardrails with the new design as government-approved, he filed a federal lawsuit alleging fraud. He also asserted that the altered design included guardrail ends that could potentially impale vehicles or their occupants in crashes.
Trinity flatly denied this claim.
In October 2014, the jury in Marshall, Texas awarded plaintiffs, including Harman and the United States government, $175 million. A federal district court judge ordered mediation in the matter, but the two sides failed to agree. The judge then exercised his authority to triple the award under the Federal False Claims Act, and he added another $138 million in penalties. As a result, on Tuesday, June 9, the judge ordered Trinity to pay a total of $682 million, including $19 million in attorney fees.
Trinity Industries plans to appeal. A Trinity spokesperson alleges that the judge made errors in applying various federal laws to the case.
Due to the judge’s decision, Harman is to receive a whistle-blower fee of $199 million plus attorney fees. The federal government is to receive the other $464 million, despite that fact that it was not even a party to the original suit that Harman filed.
After the trial concluded, a Texas research lab conducted a series of new guardrail crash tests. In February 2015, federal officials stated that the tests showed that the guardrails featuring the new design did meet federal safety standards. Harman’s attorney said that the key issue is Trinity’s previous claims that the guardrails were government-approved during a period of time when they were not.
In April 2015, federal prosecutors subpoenaed 16 years’ worth of Trinity records pertaining to a series of guardrail designs. Trinity is also a defendant in a number of personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits involving its ET-plus guardrails.
If you or a loved one have been injured as a result of using a defective product, you are urged to contact the Indianapolis Products Liability Attorneys of Wilson Kehoe Winingham. The lawyers at WKW can help you get the compensation you deserve. Call 317.920.6400 or fill out an online contact form for a free, no-obligation case evaluation.
The Superior Court of New Jersey recently affirmed a $10.6 million jury award for a master carpenter permanently limited by spinal injuries suffered when a…
The short answer to this depends on the policy. An insurance policy is a contract just like any other contract, and the terms of that…
A produce company whose roof suffered partial collapse settled their case in Federal Court at a settlement conference. The company’s roof partially collapsed, causing the…